The Persecuted Muslim Super Race by Justin Darr

Partito Nostro: Doing Business with the Clinton Syndicate

The Patsy.

After Hillary's election and the subsequent fallout from the attempted deal with Bill Clinton, Paul decided to fight back and pursue the Clintons through the Justice Department and courts in an attempt to hold them accountable for what they have done.

In the case of "PETER F. PAUL, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON FOR U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE, INC., NEW YORK SENATE 2000, DAVID ROSEN, GARY SMITH, JAMES LEVIN, and AARON TONKEN", the Clintons tried to pass off a campaign worker, David Rosen, as the mastermind behind the entire plot to defraud Paul out of millions of dollars and hide his enormous contributions from the F.E.C.

David Rosen was Hillary Clinton's national finance director and had extensive contact with Paul throughout his entire association with the Clintons and the planning of the Hollywood Tribute. However, as the foreman of the jury at the trial said, "Rosen did not have the 'means or clout' to carry out what the government alleged." (Associated Press, May 29, 2005.)

The Court acquitted Rosen of all charges because he was so low on the Clinton political totem pole that he was not even responsible to sign the fraudulent F.E.C. paperwork submitted by the Hillary Campaign.

Contrary to the Clinton's duplicitous efforts to on one hand feign support for Rosen and attest to his innocence, and on the other to paint him as some kind of super criminal out of one of Stan Lee's comics, David Rosen is, in reality, a 30-something political fundraiser whom Peter Paul "would not have bought an encyclopedia from," if it had not been for the fact that he was representing the Clintons.

In fact, treasurer of Hillary's Joint Fundraising Committee, New York State 2000, Andrew Grossman, admitted to filing the false F.E.C. reports and hiding over $700,000 in contributions from Paul in January 2006. But he is not the one getting charged. Nor have the Clintons been called to the stand to testify under oath.

However, this has not stopped the Clintons from declaring victory in the case and acting as though the acquittal of a person who was not responsible for their crimes is the same as an acquittal for themselves.

This is just one more example of the Clintons destroying a person to cover up their own crimes.

The Enablers.

The Clintons could not get away with what they do if they did not have some pretty powerful friends, or, as is the case with the Clintons, enemies who are unwilling to do what is right.

If the Clintons were not the Clintons but you, me, or any other person, they would be in jail for the crimes they committed long before the they ever met Peter Paul. However, Bill Clinton offers something to the Democratic Party that they have not had in over 40 years. A candidate with true charisma and appeal to the general public.

Take Bill Clinton away from the Democrats and all you would have would be a conglomeration of organized labor puppets with ties to organized crime, 1960's burnouts, effeminate college professors, animal-rights activists, and people who want to burn all our cars, build thatched huts, and live on nothing but tofu and wi-fi internet access.

Despite the fact Bill Clinton can never again be President, his awesome presence and ability to generate cash is so indispensable to the survival of the Democratic Party that they are even willing to try to propel his acidic wife into the White House to keep him happy.

The Democrats are also willing to sell themselves out and cut deals to protect him.

In June 2002, word was leaked that Congressional Democrats and the White House had made a secret deal where the Clintons would escape criminal indictments stemming from the "Pardongate" scandal, and, in return, Democrats would not aggressively obstruct Bush's agenda in the Congress.

Who really knows how far this deal with the devil the Republicans made to protect the Clintons actually goes. However, these are the facts in Peter Paul's case:

The Federal Election Commission, despite finding evidence supporting Peter Paul's allegations against the Clintons and even the admission of wrongdoing of Hillary's campaign treasurer has done almost nothing in five years to prosecute this case.

The Bush controlled Justice Department, likewise has done almost nothing in five years. They have refused to call the Clintons as witnesses, withheld information regarding the case from the public for years, and they have refused to prosecute high-ranking Clinton officials in lieu of David Rosen, and even then, made efforts to stress that the Clintons themselves were not targets of the prosecution.

However, the largest enabler of them all has been, surprisingly, the Republican Party.

Setting all backroom deals aside about protecting the Clintons, the Republicans know that Hillary is going to run for the Presidency in 2008 as certainly as she still does not know who the catcher for the Yankees is. The Republicans also know Hillary is no Bill Clinton.

While Hillary may be "unconvictable," she is far from "unbeatable." Her record on the issues alone makes John Kerry look like an icon on consistency by comparison, and her personality is one the American people will find abhorrent once the barriers Hillary has erected between herself and anyone who might ask her a tough question collapse under the scrutiny of a Presidential run.

Despite the fact that every conservative blogger worth his salt has a "Hillary" file at the ready for the day she declares her candidacy, much of this information is outdated.

Nobody is really going to care about Whitewater, Travelgate, Pardongate, or Monica Lewinski in 2008. These issues will be old news and Hillary would be able to easily deflect these attacks calling them "efforts to drum up the resolved issues of the past," or "the vast right wing conspiracy" trying to take another shot at Bill.

What the Republicans need is a new Clinton scandal for the 2008 election, and the Peter Paul scandal fits the bill perfectly.

However, it is too early. The Republicans do not want Hillary to lose her seat in the Senate; they want her to lose her bid for the White House. When Hillary wins the Democratic nomination, as expected, only then will the Republicans have a need for Peter Paul. But, the Republicans want to time this information's release so it has the maximum political impact.

When the magnitude of what Hillary has done becomes apparent to the American people, and they realize just how dangerous this woman is, they will never vote for her, and the White House will easily be won by another Republican.

Sounds like a good plan if you do not mind that it is unethical and deceitful. Justice delayed is justice denied, and political expedience should have no impact on the prosecution of Hillary Clinton for her violations of federal election law. No person, no matter how powerful should ever be above the law.

The Scam.

The most troublesome aspect of the Peter Paul scandal is that it is over something so basic: Being honest to the voters.

Hillary Clinton did not report how much money Peter Paul gave her campaign to produce the Hollywood Tribute, or even the fact that he ever gave it to her.

She could have easily reported it and there would have been no problem. Actually, that is not correct, there would have been a very big problem. The Hillary for Senate Campaign stated it would accept no money from Peter Paul.

On August 15, 2000, three days after the Hollywood Tribute, "The Washington Post" ran a story exposing Peter Paul's organizing the event and his felony convictions from the 1970's for his role in the "Cuban Coffee Caper." The story's author, Lloyd Grove, asked quite bluntly, "Is Hillary soft on crime?" Hillary's campaign spokesman, Howard Wolfson, stated firmly that Hillary "will not be accepting any donations from him [Paul]." Two days later, Wolfson clarified that the campaign actually had received a $2000 donation from Paul in June 2000, but that they had "returned the check."

$2000 is one heck of a lot less than $1.2 million, and being not just the underwriter of the Hollywood Tribute, but Hillary's single largest single contributor is a far cry from not "accepting any donations" from someone.

Paul was even forced to play along with this charade in fear that the multimillion dollar deal he believed he had with Bill Clinton would be jeopardized if he told the truth.

Hillary Clinton's unremitting lust for power has left her incapable of admitting the most basic facts in fear that someone might criticize her for them. She would rather do whatever she wants, and lie about it, than tell the truth or act ethically to begin.

In a sickening attempt to create a façade of infallibility, Hillary Clinton willfully lied to every single American over something most people would not have even cared about. If Hillary is so audacious to lie about who her largest contributor is, what else is she capable of lying about? How could anyone who even considers voting for her trust what she has to say?

The second very big problem Hillary has is that she raised the money to win her Senate seat illegally.

Federal election law regulates how much and in what ways "soft" money contributions like Paul's can be used to raise "hard" money. Exceed the limits, and the candidate either has to pay the soft money back within 60 days, or face restrictions on the uses of the hard money raised at the event.

If Hillary had either reported the actual cost of the event, or returned the excess expenses to Paul, she would not have had enough cash to win her election bid.

So, she chose to break the law, lied about the money Paul spent on her fundraiser, kept the full amount of the hard money raised, and tried to destroy Peter Paul in the process to keep him quiet.

What is truly horrifying are the depths Hillary Clinton will sink to gain power. Is it really worth breaking the law, destroying peoples' lives, and undermining our governmental institutions just to hold an elected office? Are the benefits of the power so great as to justify anything the Clintons have done? Just how far is Hillary Clinton willing to go, and how many of us is she willing to destroy so she can add her Presidential portrait next to her husband's?

Hillary Clinton's lust for power goes beyond mere ambition, and enters the realm of mental illness. There is literally no telling how far she would go to win, or what she would do once elected.

Peter Paul says, "The truth is worth fighting for." Faced with the possibility of a megalomaniac like Hillary Clinton being elected President, I hope he fights hard. And, I pray he wins.